Friday, January 6, 2012

Devastating Drought Seems Inevitable in American West

DRYING OUT IN THE U.S.: The falling water level of Lake Mead near Las Vegas has left behind a white ring of mineral deposits Image: Christopher J. Morris/Redux Pictures

Australia experienced the worst and most consistent dry period in its recorded history over much of the past decade. The Murray River failed to reach the sea for the first time ever in 2002. Fires swept much of the country, and dust storms blanketed major cities for days. Australia?s sheep population dropped by 50 percent, and rice and cotton production collapsed in some years. Tens of thousands of farm families gave up their livelihoods. The drought ended in 2010 with torrential rains and flooding.

Australia?s Millennium Drought is a wake-up call for residents of the drought-plagued southwestern U.S. and for all of us. What happened in Australia could happen in the U.S., with devastating consequences to the region and to the nation. We can avert the worst, however, if we pay attention to Australia?s experience and learn the right lessons.

The southwestern U.S. bears some resemblance to parts of Australia before the drought. Both include arid regions where thirsty cities and irrigated agriculture are straining water supplies and damaging ecosystems. The Colorado River no longer flows to the sea in most years. Water levels in major reservoirs have steadily declined over the past decade; some analysts project that the largest may never refill. The U.S. and Australia also share a changing global climate that is increasing the risk of drought.

Evidence is mounting that climate change is playing a role in Australia?s water woes. Since 1950 average rainfall has decreased 15 percent, and researchers found average temperatures over southeastern Australia from 1995 to 2006 were 0.3 to 0.6 degree Celsius higher than the long-term average. The combination of higher evaporation and lower precipitation depletes soil moisture and reduces runoff, making droughts more intense and more frequent. Australian scientists forecast a 35 to 50 percent decline in water availability in the Murray-Darling river basin and a drop in flows near the mouth of the Murray by up to 70 percent by 2030. ?

The Millennium Drought did have one benefit: it got people?s attention. Australians responded to these extremes with a wide range of technical, economic, regulatory and educational policies. Urban water managers in Australia have been forced to put in place aggressive strategies to curb water use and to expand sources of new and unconventional supplies. They have subsidized efficient appliances and fixtures such as dual-flush toilets, launched public educational campaigns to save water, and more. Between 2002 and 2008 per capita urban water use?already low compared with the western U.S.?declined by 37 percent.

Other efforts focus on tapping unconventional supplies, such as systems that reuse gray water, cisterns to harvest rooftop runoff, and sewage treatment and reuse. The country?s five largest cities are spending $13.2 billion to double the capacity of desalination, enough to meet 30 percent of current urban water needs.

Even in the midst of the drought, Australia moved forward with plans to restore water to severely degraded aquatic ecosystems. The government has continued with plans to restore rivers and wetlands by cutting withdrawals from the Murray-Darling river basin by 22 to 29 percent. It has committed $3 billion to purchase water from irrigators to restore ecosystems. Regulators introduced water markets in the hope of making farms more water-efficient and reducing waste. Despite efforts to phase out subsidies, the government announced more than $6 billion in aid to improve irrigation infrastructure and make it more productive.

The southwestern U.S. states would do well to push for these kinds of reforms before a similar disaster strikes. They need to tackle difficult policy issues, such as development of water markets and pricing, expansion of water efficiency and productivity programs, elimination of government subsidies that encourage inefficient or unproductive water use by cities and farms, and agricultural reform. As the climate continues to change, smart water planning may help ease the impacts of unexpected and severe shocks that now appear inevitable.

This article was originally published as "The Coming Mega Drought."

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=571047fd947816f91aa1d4511427d3cd

lisa lampanelli

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Exclusive: Eric Johnson, Michael Eklund Head to Alcatraz (omg!)

Fringe's Michael Eklund and Smallville's Eric Johnson have been tapped to portray escaped prisoners on Fox's new drama Alcatraz, TVGuide.com has learned exclusively.

J.J. Abrams' new sci-fi series centers on a cop (Sarah Jones) and a team of FBI agents who track down a group of missing Alcatraz prisoners and guards who have reappeared in the present day after disappearing 30 years earlier.

Fox announces midseason schedule

Eklund, whose credits also include Flashpoint and Caprica, will play Kit Nelson, a terrifying kidnapper who always returns his victims to their homes... after he's killed them. He'll appear in Episode 103, airing Monday, Jan. 23.

Johnson, who currently stars on Rookie Blue, will portray Cal Sweeney, a smooth talking bank robber whose interests lie in safety deposit boxes and the secrets they contain. He'll appear in Episode 104, slated to air Monday, Jan. 30.

VIDEO: Get a first look at J.J. Abrams' Alcatraz

Check out a sneak peek of Alcatraz, which debuts with a special two-hour event on Monday, Jan. 16 at 8/7c on Fox.

Related Articles on TVGuide.com

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/entertainment/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/omg_rss/rss_omg_en/news_exclusive_eric_johnson_michael_eklund_head_alcatraz223300014/44077942/*http%3A//omg.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-eric-johnson-michael-eklund-head-alcatraz-223300014.html

duggar family dingo fidel castro gilbert arenas north korea dexter dexter

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Video: Cutting Debt in 2012

Measuring countries' debt to GDP and why governments, such as Germany, is allowing massive de-leveraging, with Sean Egan, Egan-Jones Ratings Company founding principal/president & managing director.

Related Links:

Business & financial news headlines from msnbc.com

Source: http://video.msnbc.msn.com/cnbc/45855364/

emergency alert system chelsea handler alexander the great alabama football 21 jump street 19 kids and counting 2011 election results

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Red's Scarlet-X 4K camera gets video review: you've never needed $11,700 so badly

Native 4K recording? Check. A built-for-war body? You bet. Backordered despite a downright shocking $11,700 price tag? Most certainly. As with Red's prior products, the Scarlet-X seems to be wowing just about every shooter lucky enough to come into contact with one. Luck for you, the folks over at Cinema5D have spent an inordinate of amount of time with this beast in order to deliver the full skinny on whether it's worth the price (and wait). We won't bother spoiling any conclusions for you, but if you've been toying with the idea of blowing your (and your SO's) bonus on one of these in a bid to start your own movie house, there's a vid just after the break that deserves your attention.

Continue reading Red's Scarlet-X 4K camera gets video review: you've never needed $11,700 so badly

Red's Scarlet-X 4K camera gets video review: you've never needed $11,700 so badly originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:08:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceCinema5D, Red  | Email this | Comments


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/4p21_hJ7qhg/

brian urlacher matt forte dr conrad murray verdict take care childish gambino camp drake take care tracklist drake take care tracklist

Monday, January 2, 2012

Families who lost homes in Joplin Tornado looking forward to 2012

This blog features observations from Joplin East Middle School communication arts teacher Randy Turner, formerly an award-winning reporter/editor for various Missouri newspapers. The comments on the blog do not represent the views of the Joplin R-8 School District. Send news items or comments to rturner229@hotmail.com

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/ASRIt/~3/hHup6YbKThw/families-who-lost-homes-in-joplin.html

chris paul chicago bulls carmelo anthony david lee gift card exchange tj holmes bulls

Which GOP rivals would vote for Ron Paul if he's GOP nominee?

Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Mitt Romney are on the record about how they would vote. Other Republican candidates have sidestepped the matter, saying Ron Paul won't be the GOP nominee.

With libertarian-leaning Ron Paul riding high in polls of Republican voters in Iowa, a simple question has become a hot one in recent days for his rivals in the presidential race: If the Texas congressman were to win the Republican nomination, would they vote for him?

Skip to next paragraph

So far Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum have said yes.

Newt Gingrich has said no.

And all six of Representative Paul's rivals have strongly criticized his views, notably on foreign policy.

On Wednesday, former Massachusetts Governor Romney, the other candidate at the top of polling in Iowa, weighed in with a yes.

?I?ve already crossed that river, if you will, by saying [in Republican debates] ... that all of the people on stage would be superior to the president we have,? Romney told CNN interviewer Wolf Blitzer. ?So yes, I would vote for him.?

On Friday, however, Mr. Romney sounded decidedly less enthusiastic, while stopping short of reversing his position. "I don't think Ron Paul represents the mainstream," he said. "I'm working harder than anyone to make sure he's not the nominee."

Romney's use of "mainstream" echoed another GOP candidate, former House Speaker Gingrich, who gave a flat "no" when asked if he could vote for Paul.

"I think Ron Paul's views are totally outside the mainstream of every decent American," Gingrich said Tuesday in his own chat with Mr. Blitzer. "There will come a morning when people won't take him as a serious person."

Gingrich said Paul had allowed "racist" content to go out in newsletters bearing his name, is "a person who thinks the United States was responsible for 9/11," and is "a person who believes it doesn't matter if the Iranians have a nuclear weapon."

At the same time, Gingrich didn't commit his vote when asked to make a choice between Paul and Barack Obama. He referred to President Obama as "very destructive to the future of the United States."

All the other Republican candidates have stood at odds with Paul on foreign policy, where he supports noninterventionism and a pullback of American military presence worldwide.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/4wSEe7rhlsY/Which-GOP-rivals-would-vote-for-Ron-Paul-if-he-s-GOP-nominee

karina smirnoff pumpkin cheesecake deviled eggs pie crust pie crust stuffing recipe happy thanksgiving